My article ran today in The Hill, the same day the Democrat Governor of Nevada decided to veto the National Popular Vote legislation sent to him! Well done, Governor!
Here is an excerpt from my article in The Hill:
The election in Nevada in 2016, in fact, is a good microcosm of what
will happen to Nevada and other small and rural states if he NPV compact
succeeds. Clinton did not win Nevada by traveling the state and
appealing to a wide swath of the population. She won Nevada by winning a
in just one county (and a slight plurality in one other). Where Clinton
won the whole state by just 27,000 votes, she won more than 82,000
votes more than Trump simply in the county containing Las Vegas, and
thereby won the state.
those supporting the National Popular Vote initiative succeed, they
will make all small and rural states like Nevada irrelevant in our
national presidential conversation. In making these voters irrelevant,
they also will be radicalizing our politics by centering ever more power
in major urban centers, which already contribute most of the money
fueling our campaigns and the media reporting on them.
this is happening within state legislatures without a serious national
conversation that an actual amendment to the Constitution would demand —
one that which our republic deserves.